Fuel Smarts

What Will California Governor's Energy Goals Mean for Trucking?

January 08, 2015, by Evan Lockridge

Governor Brown delivers inaugural address. Photo: Brad Alexander, Office of the Governor.
Governor Brown delivers inaugural address. Photo: Brad Alexander, Office of the Governor.

In his inaugural address this week, California Gov. Jerry Brown laid out what he called “bold commitments” to sustain the environment in the nation’s most populous state, by reducing energy consumption.

Among his goals over the next 15 years is to reduce petroleum use in both trucks and passenger vehicles by up to 50%, along with increasing the percentage of the state’s electricity derived from renewable resources to 50% and doubling the energy efficiency of existing buildings, including making heating fuels cleaner.

The news was immediately greeted warmly by environmental groups. Earthjustice Vice President Abigail Dillen said, “We applaud Gov. Brown for working to secure a cleaner, brighter future for California and paving the way for the rest of the country and the world to follow. Weaning the state off dirty fossil fuels and embracing clean energy is the kind of immediate action we need to confront the worst effects of climate change.”

While some in trucking may worry this will mean more regulations and higher costs, Brown’s announcement is not really a major policy change. California’s Air Resources Board has been working on its Sustainable Freight Initiative, due out later this year. It is expected to mean new regulations requiring improved efficiency in freight movements, along with zero or near-zero emissions from equipment used to transport cargo, according to Joe Rajkovacz, director of governmental affairs & communications for the California Construction Trucking Association and its interstate conference, the Western Trucking Alliance.

“One of CARB’s goals is the migration towards electric-powered heavy-duty vehicles and hydrogen powered vehicles. They don’t even view natural gas as a so-called bridge fuel. They want to move beyond fossil fuels, period,” he said in an interview.

For instance, Rajkovacz expects to start seeing mandates in 2017 that would ban the use of diesel-powered equipment for vocational trucking running just in the Los Angeles basin, which would be in place by the middle of the next decade.

Nearly four years ago, CCTA filed suit against CARB challenging the legality of its statewide truck and bus rules that require such equipment to be less polluting. That effort continues, with the next hearing set for February.

“We have been saying for a long time these such mandates were never going to end," Rajkovacz said. "I think a lot of people feel beat down by these constant regulations to reshape the marketplace, and that’s one of the reasons we continue to pursue our litigation against CARB."

For on-highway truck owners, either those running intrastate in California or those running in and out of the state, Rajkovacz believes there is less reason for concern, though he is cautious.

“I think the long-haul segment has less to worry about from this in terms of being potentially forced into purchasing newer trucks that basically right now don’t exist. For example, there isn’t an electric line haul truck that’s available,” he said.

What he is less certain about are possible California mandates that say, for instance, say you can’t use diesel anymore and that you have to use natural gas as a bridge fuel on long-haul trucks. This is where he says lawsuits against CARB by CCTA, as well as separate ones by others, become all the more important.

“If the dust settles on this and CARB feels there is nothing that can be done to stop them from making these mandates, they are going to have lots of stricter rules in the future."

Comments

  1. 1. Kenny Scott [ January 09, 2015 @ 06:01AM ]

    The people of Ca elected Brown ,he is a destructive force in American and I stand against his kind. I try not to buy anything made or from Ca and although Ca is a beautiful St I will not Vaction there again. I feel sorry for the normal American who lives in Ca.

  2. 2. Chris Fuller [ January 09, 2015 @ 10:20AM ]

    Good job leading this country California. As a nation we cannot stay stuck in our old fashioned ways just because there are groups with a financial interest in doing so. Other Countries are taking steps towards capturing the future technology markets of better energy efficiencies. It is unfortunate that it takes the Government to push these markets open in America. Whom ever leads the world into the technology future, will be the World leader for centuries to come.

  3. 3. Big Yellower [ January 09, 2015 @ 11:57AM ]

    Its just another nail in communist California coffin.. It will push companies to stop dealing with California period.. You want our products it will cost you. Like $10.00-90.00 a mile. And of course charge $1,000.00 a ton for any products made outside California . It will litterly destroy their island economy. Only way to get through to them "commi" is to cut them off from the rest of the country..

  4. 4. Paul Goldstein [ January 10, 2015 @ 07:39AM ]

    As a resident of California and having to live under the "communistic" rule of CARB it makes it difficult to operate. I run 2 trucks, one compliant and one not. If I want to expand, I have to spend a ton of money to buy another compliant truck, but if I lived in say Texas, I could expand with older, much less expensive equipment. Like many other California based truckers, I am seriously considering a move to another state. The emissions in California is just the tip of the iceberg on operating costs....workers compensation insurance (which is not required in most states) for a truck driver is 27%...that means for every $100 in driver pay, I pay $27 to the insurance company. We pay WAY more in license fees, fuel is traditionally higher here, a place to park your trucks extremely expensive, just EVERYTHING here costs more. Trust me, if it wasn't for the weather here, the population here would be 2.... It certainly isn't the lax government that keeps people here.

  5. 5. Gene Frenkle [ January 10, 2015 @ 10:35AM ]

    Diesel should be phased out in urban fleet vehicles. The absurd Europeans promoted diesel because of concerns about carbon emissions and now their cities are filled with smog. I think in general Brown is misguided but banning diesels is a legitimate use of state power and our huge natural gas reserves makes CNG a viable alternative. Texas has all the natural gas they need thanks to fracking!

  6. 6. Jack Kalpakian [ January 11, 2015 @ 06:45AM ]

    OK, so I take it that CARB will manufacture and offer the equipment it is mandating? Well I think that an agency making rules that it is proposing should be burdened with the responsibility of manufacturing the alternatives itself along with warranties for its customers.

  7. 7. durk [ January 11, 2015 @ 05:14PM ]

    Hey Paul, I here new jersey is truck friendly
    Just don't come to Texas y'all.

  8. 8. WV trucker [ January 12, 2015 @ 11:01PM ]

    Well I wont even go to or through California, so untill this all leaks into the real world I am good.

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 10000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

 

FleetFAQ

Fleet Management And Leasing

Merchants Experts will answer your questions and challenges

View All
 

Grants & Subsidies

Alternative Fueling Station Locator

Alternative Fueling Station Locator

Find your closest station or plan a route. Locate biodiesel, electric, ethanol, hydrogen, compressed natural gas (CNG), liquified natural gas (LNG), and propane across America.

Start Your Search